You’ll find answers below to many frequently asked questions organized into categories.
Expand and collapse each category by clicking on the symbols.
Inside Mediation
I don’t like confrontation. What can I expect in mediation?
Mediation is non-confrontational. Quite different from either the fight
(confrontational) or flight (avoidant) reactions to conflict, mediation is oriented instead towards
settlement without ascribing blame, fault, or guilt on either party. That said, we don’t believe in
banishing emotion from the mediation process. Indeed, we believe that emotions are authentic
expressions of feelings, which our skilled mediators can reflect and redirect to help parties settle
their disputes.
Is mediation about making up?
No. Mediation is about resolving disputes. The mediator’s job is to give the parties every
opportunity to reach a settlement, but the parties themselves decide what kind of settlement, if any,
they want to reach. The mediator has no agenda. Divorce, family, and relational mediation is generally
a process of disentanglement rather than reconciliation. If parties decide during, say, divorce mediation
that they want to rebuild their marriage, the mediator can refer them to a couples counselor. Mediators,
even when trained as counselors or therapists, don’t act as such while conducting mediation.
What about trust? Am I protected from dishonesty by the other party?
Before commencing mediation, your mediator will require you to sign an Agreement to Mediate form. This form commits parties to full disclosure of all appropriate information, including financial statements. We also recommend that parties each review any proposed settlement
with their respective consultant attorneys. You (or your attorney) may request further verification of the other party’s statements before approving the settlement.
Parties to civil actions such as dissolution of marriage are further protected by any obligations to make disclosures to one another under penalty of perjury. Parties who
submit false or incomplete statements may be liable for punitive damages, and judgments entered on the basis of such statements may be set aside.
The above safeguards notwithstanding, you may still doubt the other party’s
willingness to participate honestly in mediation. Though very costly to both parties, the formal
discovery process of an adversarial litigation is best in cases such as these.
What happens in a mediation session?
Our mediation sessions are friendly and informal and results oriented. The
mediator guides the conversation, identifying issues and using a proven, problem-solving process
that enables you to attack the problem, not each other. The process — which typically produces a settlement
in three to five sessions — is constructive and collaborative.
We structure sessions to address issues in order. However, sometimes the parties need to gather additional
information or consult with an attorney or other expert before they can make a decision. In these situations,
the parties may either adjourn until they have the missing information or they can address other aspects of
the dispute.
Who else can attend a mediation session?
Mediation is an integrative process. This means that, if both parties agree,
other professionals such as certified financial planners, consultant attorneys, and child
psychologists may attend a mediation session to clarify specific issues of a settlement. Parties may
also, of course, consult these professionals privately between sessions.
Also, by mutual consent, parties can bring a friend, relative, or associate to lend moral
support rather than professional expertise. This person may either participate in the mediation
discussion or remain a passive observer.
Can children participate in mediation?
Parents in divorce, separation, or visitation disputes sometimes wish to include
their children in the mediation process. If both parents agree, the mediator may consent to this under
certain conditions. However, the first mediation session always takes place without children.
Is a mediated settlement legally binding?
It will become so if you wish to make it so. For court-supervised matters such
as dissolution of marriage, you may take
your proposed settlement to
your respective attorneys for review. Then, if you both remain comfortable with the proposed settlement,
one of your attorneys, an independent attorney, or a legal document assistant (paralegal)
will usually prepare your marital settlement agreement (MSA). Once submitted to
the court and approved by a judge, the MSA becomes a legally binding order of the court.
For modifications to child custody and child support agreements, you may file your mediated agreement directly with the court. Likewise, mediated settlements to other civil disputes — for example, a mediated agreement between siblings to share an elderly parent’s assisted-living costs — can be drafted as legally binding private contracts between parties, enforceable in civil court.
What happens if we can’t agree in mediation?
Some 80% of divorce, family, and relational disputes settle in mediation.
Moreover, even if you can’t agree on every issue, you’ll probably agree on many and save a lot of
money in consequence. But if mediation isn’t productive, you’re always free to stop and pursue a
settlement through litigation instead. Mediation doesn’t diminish any of your rights. It’s a
promising first resort before submitting to litigation.
Can attorney-mediators issue legal advice?
No. Attorneys cannot issue legal advice to a client if they have a conflict of
interest. The mediator’s obligation of impartiality presents a conflict of interest for any attorney-mediator
who might issue legal advice to either party. All mediators — including attorney-mediators — must refrain from issuing legal advice to the parties in a dispute.
Mediators may, however, provide relevant legal information.
Distinct from legal advice, which is individualized to a particular party, legal information is general and publicly available. Access to legal information will help you make the best decisions for yourself and your family. We also encourage parties to seek legal advice by
consulting their own attorneys at any point during mediation.
How do you stay impartial?
Impartiality is a tenet of our profession. Without it, we’d immediately lose the trust of one or
both parties and our mediation sessions would abruptly terminate. Our mediators are trained to be
impartial accordingly. What helps is that we have no agenda except to give you every
opportunity to reach a fair agreement if you wish to do so.
Yes. Whereas parties are usually present in person, telephone mediation is a good alternative when parties cannot (for reasons of geography) or will not (for emotional reasons) meet at the same location.
How long is each session?
The parties largely determine the length of each mediation session. For example, sometimes
parties meet for just one hour before adjourning. Other sessions may extend as long as three hours.
Sessions are typically two hours.
When is the right time to begin mediation?
Now. Experience shows that positions harden with the passage of time and the onset of litigation. For this reason, the best time to begin mediation is always sooner rather than
later. That said, many parties commence mediation later in their dispute cycle as the emotional and
financial toll of litigation begins to mount. Parties to a family dispute can begin mediation either before or after filing their petition,
summons, and response with the court.
I’d like to participate in mediation, but should I also talk to an attorney?
We recommend that all parties consult an attorney at least once, each asking their respective
attorneys to review any proposed settlement. For some parties, a single consultation at the
end of mediation is sufficient. Other parties, however, prefer to consult their attorneys more
frequently.
Parties might, for example, talk with an attorney before the first mediation session to help
develop proposals based on likely best and worst outcomes if the case were contested in court. They
might continue to consult with their attorney as issues arise between mediation sessions. And
parties might even, by mutual consent, ask their attorneys to accompany them in mediation.
Your choice of attorney is actually more important than the frequency of consultation. Many
attorneys believe strongly in the benefits of mediation, but others see mediation as a threat to
their business of representing clients in litigation. A mediation-friendly attorney will be happy to
consult with you on an hourly basis rather than demand that you retain him/her to represent you in litigation.
How do you stay impartial?
Impartiality is a tenet of our profession. Without it, we’d immediately lose the trust of one or
both parties and our mediation sessions would abruptly terminate. Our mediators are trained to be
impartial accordingly. What helps is that we have no agenda except to give you every
opportunity to reach a fair agreement if you wish to do so.
I have a lot of emotion over this. I don’t know if I can sit calmly across the table from the other
party and work out an agreement.
You’re not alone! Most disputes — especially divorce, family,
and relational disputes — are steeped in emotion. Some mediators try to look beyond
emotion as if it weren’t an inextricable part of your relationship to your dispute.
They suppose that their refusal to acknowledge emotion will somehow force otherwise
emotional parties into logical and cooperative behaviors. We think this approach
to mediation is a mistake.
Our mediators understand that your emotions are authentic expressions of your feelings. Moreover, we reflect and redirect these emotions to help our clients settle their disputes. Indeed, we ensure that our mediation sessions provide a safe environment for the expression of emotions without threatening the equanimity of either party.
Isn’t mediation just for friendly disputes?
No. Our mediators frequently work with profound emotions such as anger, fear, hurt, and pain. In fact,
parties who feel intense hostility towards one another are among the greatest beneficiaries of mediation,
for their disputes will carry the greatest emotional and financial cost if pursued in litigation.
I don’t like confrontation. What can I expect in mediation?
Mediation is non-confrontational. Quite different from either the fight (confrontational) or
flight (avoidant) responses to conflict, it’s oriented instead towards settlement without ascribing
blame, fault, or guilt on either party. That said, we don’t believe in banishing emotion from the
mediation process. Indeed, we believe that emotions are authentic expressions of feelings, which
our skilled mediators reflect and redirect to help parties settle their dispute.
Must we meet in the same room? Can we use our mediator as a kind of go-between?
Direct communication is one of mediation’s many benefits. Litigation, in contrast, isolates
parties, rendering them unable to communicate their views directly to one another. With this in
mind, we emphasize joint sessions in which both parties are in the same room together with their
mediator. However, the mediator may break a joint session at an appropriate time to meet privately
with each party. With the parties’ consent, the mediator may also use these private meetings to act as a
go-between if such shuttle diplomacy can facilitate a resolution.
I’d like to participate in mediation, but should I also talk to an attorney?
We recommend that all parties consult an attorney at least once, each asking their respective
attorneys to review any proposed settlement. For some parties, a single consultation towards the
end of mediation is sufficient. Other parties, however, prefer to consult with their attorneys more
frequently.
Parties might, for example, talk with an attorney before the first mediation session to help
develop proposals based on likely best and worst outcomes if the case were contested in court. They
might continue to consult with their attorney as issues arise between mediation sessions. And parties
might even, by mutual consent, ask their attorneys to accompany them in mediation.
Your choice of attorney is actually more important than the frequency of consultation. Many
attorneys believe strongly in the benefits of mediation, but others see mediation as a threat to
their business of representing clients in litigation. A mediation-friendly attorney will be happy to
consult with you on an hourly basis rather than demand that you retain him/her to represent you in litigation.
What makes a good attorney for consultation and advice?
Of course, your consultant attorney should have expertise in the area of law that’s
relevant to your case: family law, elder law, business law, etc. To this end,
look for a specialist rather than a generalist who dabbles in several areas. Also important, find an attorney who can answer your questions in language that you understand — no jargon or legalese. Finally, avoid attorneys who seem overly aggressive or cynical. They’ll make your conflict worse, potentially derailing your best efforts to reach a settlement
without the costs of litigation. Contact one of our mediators if you’d like some referrals to consultant
attorneys.
I really don’t want lawyers involved. Can we avoid them entirely?
Yes. Mediation supports parties in resolving disputes in a way that fulfills their interests. Such a resolution may or may not coincide exactly with a settlement achieved through litigation. Indeed, for many types of family and relational disputes, the parties regard attorney involvement as inappropriate or premature.
In other types of dispute, however, parties prefer to consult with attorneys. You won’t be surrendering control of your case and engaging in an adversarial litigation. Rather, for a relatively small expense, you may gain peace of mind from having sought legal counsel.
Can attorney-mediators issue legal advice?
No. Attorneys cannot issue legal advice to a client if they have a conflict of interest. The mediator’s obligation of impartiality presents a conflict of interest for any attorney-mediator who might issue legal advice to either party. All mediators — including attorney-mediators — must refrain from issuing legal advice to the parties in a dispute.
Mediators may, however, provide relevant legal information. Distinct from legal advice, which is individualized to a particular party, legal information is general and publicly available. Access to legal information will help you make the best decisions for yourself and your family. We also encourage parties to seek legal advice by consulting their own attorneys at any point during mediation.
Should our mediator be a practicing attorney?
Your mediator should be a professional mediator. Mediation is distinct from the adversarial
process of litigation in which attorneys are trained. Consultant attorneys are complementary to the mediation process. For example, a consultant attorney can assess the strengths and weaknesses of a party’s legal case, develop counter-proposals to offers by the other party, and suggest potential best-case and worst-case outcomes if the dispute
were contested in court. Consultant attorneys can also review a mediated settlement before the parties made it legally binding. Attorneys might even accompany their respective clients to mediation sessions.
In summary, New Resolution recommends both specialist mediators and specialist attorneys: specialist mediators for
their expertise in conflict resolution and specialist attorneys for their counsel in law and
litigation. Your dispute is too important to hire a jack of all trades and master of none.
Divorce, family, and relational disputes. Examples include dissolutions of marriage, legal
separations, co-parenting disputes, inheritance and estate disputes, property disputes, and disputes within small
businesses and family businesses. Please contact us,
request a telephone consultation, or schedule an in-person consultation to discuss whether your particular dispute might be suitable for mediation.
Can we mediate just one aspect of our dispute?
Yes. Disputes often comprise multiple issues. Dissolutions of marriage, for example, often comprise a division of assets and debts, the choice of who will reside in the family home,
arrangements for any children, child support, spousal support (also known as maintenance or alimony), and sensitive issues such as
the introduction of new partners to children.
In such multi-issue disputes, you’re welcome to mediate just one or two issues, setting others
aside for resolution by alternative means such as litigation if necessary. You may be able to successfully
mediate even the most contentious issues in your dispute. But even if not, you’ll save money and reduce
the emotional cost of litigation for every issue that you resolve in mediation.
Can mediation be used to modify existing agreements?
Yes. The circumstances of our lives are continually changing. In consequence, last year’s
resolution may no longer suit one or other party. This applies to resolutions achieved both through litigation and through mediation. In either case, unless specifically prohibited, parties can always renegotiate an existing agreement in light of their changed circumstances. For example, some time after a dissolution of marriage, one party may wish for a change in the coparenting schedule.
Is every case suitable for mediation?
No. Most divorce, family, and relational disputes are best settled in mediation. However,
litigation is sometimes a more suitable alternative. For that reason, we consider the following
factors before accepting a case: (i) a history of violence or abuse between the parties, (ii) an
insuperable power differential between the parties, (iii) persistent doubts concerning the candor of
either party, safeguards notwithstanding, and (iv) a recent history of mental health disorders or substance
abuse that may impair participation.
Our assessment of each case is confidential and depends on the full disclosure of both parties.
Your cooperation helps us determine the most suitable forum for resolving your dispute. Our mediators
reserve the right to terminate mediation at any point if they believe that the parties would be better
served by an alternative resolution process.
Does mediation ever fail?
Rarely. Some 80% of divorce, family, and relational disputes settle in mediation. Moreover,
even if you can’t agree on every issue, you’ll probably agree on many and save a lot of money in
consequence. And you always retain the freedom to stop mediation at any time and pursue litigation
instead.
The parties who are least likely to reach a settlement in mediation experience their conflict as
a moral cause or crusade. They seek to avenge or vanquish the other party. Mediation — oriented
towards settlement without ascribing blame or fault — will always disappoint such crusaders.
Parties should recognize though that they are hardly more likely to find vindication in court.
Judges’ rulings — particularly in divorce, family, and relational disputes — are usually
based on either state-mandated guidelines or compromises between the parties’ positions. Nevertheless,
a judicial ruling does at least offer the possibility of vindication to parties who are willing to accept the
costs and risks of litigation.
I want to try mediation, but I’m not sure about the other party. Can you help?
Yes. One party will often identify mediation as a preferred route to resolution while the other remains unsure or unaware of mediation. In such situations, you can proceed in several ways: You may want to tell the other party about mediation yourself by pointing them to our site. You may want us to invite the other party to mediation on your behalf via telephone, mail, or e-mail. Or you may prefer to schedule a telephone or in-person consultation to discuss mediation in your particular case.
I want to try mediation, but I’m not sure about the other party. Can you help?
Yes. One party will often identify mediation as a preferred route to resolution while the other remains unsure or unaware of mediation. In such situations, you can proceed in several ways: You may want to tell the other party about mediation yourself by pointing them to our site. You may want us to invite the other party to mediation on your behalf via telephone, mail, or e-mail. Or you may prefer to schedule a telephone or in-person consultation to discuss mediation in your particular case.
When is the right time to begin mediation?
Now. Experience shows that positions harden with the passage of time and the
onset of litigation. For this reason, the best time to begin mediation is always sooner rather than
later. That said, many parties commence mediation later in their dispute cycle as the emotional and
financial toll of litigation begins to mount.